Isostasy, flexure, and dynamic topography
نویسندگان
چکیده
Article history: Received 12 January 2016 Received in revised form 26 May 2016 Accepted 27 May 2016 Available online 31 May 2016 A fundamental scientific question is, what controls the Earth's topography? Although the theoretical principles of isostasy, flexure, and dynamic topography arewidely discussed, the parameters needed to apply these principles are frequently not available. Isostatic factors controlling lithospheric buoyancy are frequently uncertain and nonisostatic factors, such as lithospheric bending towards subduction zones and dynamic topography, are hard to distinguish. The question discussed here is whether a set of simple rules that relate topography to lithospheric structure in various tectonic environments can be deduced in away that missing parameters can be approximated; or does each area behave differently, making generalizations problematic. We contribute to this issue analyzing the Asia–Africa–Arabia–Europe domain following a top-down strategy. We compile a new crustal thickness map and remove the contribution of the crust from the observed elevation. Then, the challenge is to interpret the residual topography in terms of mantle lithosphere buoyancy and dynamics. Based on systematic relationships between tectonic environments and factors controlling topography, we argue that crustal buoyancy and mantle lithospheric density can be approximated fromavailable geological data and that regions nearmantle upwelling or downwelling are easily identified by their extreme residual topography. Yet, even for other areas, calculating lithospheric thickness from residual topography is problematic, because distinguishing variations in mantle lithosphere thickness from sub-lithospheric dynamics is difficult. Fortunately, the area studied here provides an opportunity to examine this issue. Based on the conjunction between the Afar Plume and themid-ocean ridge in the nearby Gulf of Aden and southern Red Sea, we constrain the maximal amplitude of dynamic topography to ~1 km. This estimate is based on a narrow definition of dynamic topography that only includes sublithospheric processes and using mid-ocean ridges as reference, where mantle lithosphere buoyancy is zero. © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
The Effects of Dynamic Topography and Thermal Isostasy on the Topogra- Phy and Geoid of Venus
Introduction: The Venusian geoid, gravity field, and topography have been used in a variety of applications and are the primary sources of information about the internal structure of the planet. We focus on the relationship between the geoid and topography to determine both the support mechanism for the topography and lithospheric density structure. Magnitude of Dynamic Topography: The long-wav...
متن کاملIsostasy, dynamic topography, and the elevation of the Apennines of Italy
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t The elevation of an orogenic belt is commonly related to crustal/lithosphere thickening. Here, we discuss the Apennines as an example to show that topography at a plate margin may be controlled not only by isostatic adjustment but also by dynamic, mantle-driven processes. Using recent structural constraints for the crust and mantle we find that the expected...
متن کاملJournalresponse to denudational isostasy ' : Discussion on ’ An analysis of Cotswold topography : insights into the landscape
متن کامل
Flexural Response to Sediment Erosion and Unloading at Valles Marineris,
Introduction: The origin and evolution of the Valles Marineris canyon system and its stacks of interior layered deposits (ILD) on Mars remains as one of the most debated topics in Martian tectonics. The subtle broad topographic uplift around the periphery of the canyon system conflicts with the uplifted flanks predicted by models of normal faulting [1]. This uplift is obscured in the east and w...
متن کامل